Read More
The Cantor article “Inside the Mind of an Enterprise Software Investment Banker” [1] unfolds valuable insights from Mark Baillie, whose perspective brings clarity to how enterprise software companies should shape strategy, positioning, and prepare for funding or sale. What follows are the strategic implications and open questions that emerge from those lessons.
1. Timeless pains, modern tools: Baillie reminds us that certain business problems—engaging customers, managing HR, supply chain efficiency—have been around for decades, but the way companies address them has changed (outsourcing non-core functions, embracing cloud infrastructure, AI-based agents). For investment bankers, the implication is that market opportunity lies in software solutions that modernize legacy workflows—a strong fit for M&A interest or investment capital. A key open question is which legacy workflows remain most unaddressed and what barriers (technical, regulatory, cultural) prevent their modernization at scale.
2. Best-of-Breed vs Monolith Battles: An oscillation between picking specialized tools vs broad integrated platforms reflects both buyer behavior and valuation dynamics. Investors often favor best-of-breed when there’s innovation; larger vendors respond via R&D or M&A. For sellers, framing oneself as either the next best tool or an eventual acquisition target for a suite is a strategic choice. This pushes companies to think about defensibility via integration capability, differentiable features, and go-to-market stories. Open question: where in the tech stack will buyers accept integration trade-offs, and how will open APIs / modular architectures shift the value of best-of-breed players? Also, whether regulatory scrutiny of large vendors will affect acquisitions of smaller best-of-breed firms.
3. The narrative and proof are equally vital: Baillie underscores that knowing your metrics, being realistic about growth, and maintaining credibility with investors matter as much as big visions. Renewals, team integrity, people diligence, and consistency in message are observed closely. “People diligence” doesn’t end until the check clears: cultures, leadership track records, customer relationships are scrutinized. Strategically, companies should invest in operational discipline—forecasting, retention, execution—well ahead of a liquidity event. A key question: for founder-led companies without institutional capital, how best to build these systems from scratch efficiently?
4. Market and macro tailwinds: Supporting sources show strong ongoing momentum in software M&A, driven by private equity buy-and-build strategies, high multiples for AI-embedded tools, and growth expectations for cloud and data infrastructure. The enterprise software market is projected to grow from approx. USD 257B in 2025 to USD 643B by 2033 at a CAGR near 12% ([globenewswire.com](https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2025/10/09/3164257/0/en/Enterprise-Software-Market-Anticipated-to-Touch-USD-643-40-Billion-by-2033-Driven-by-Cloud-Adoption-and-Integrated-Solutions-SNS-Insider.html?utmsource=openai)). Q1 2025 saw 210 enterprise SaaS M&A deals, similar to Q4 2024, with increasing deal count in PE-led transactions ([fortune.com](https://fortune.com/2025/06/17/in-q1-2025-enterprise-saas-ma-deal-count-hit-210-according-to-pitchbook/?utmsource=openai)). This supports Baillie’s view of a market where both competition and opportunities are intensifying. Open question: how rising interest rates, financing costs, and macroeconomic uncertainty might dampen valuations or slow cycles.
5. Valuation dynamics and buyer premiums: Strategic buyers are paying meaningfully higher multiples than financial buyers in software deals (EV/revenue multiples of ~5.4× for strategic vs ~4.6× for financial buyers in Q2 2025) ([kroll.com](https://www.kroll.com/en/publications/m-and-a/global-software-sector-update-summer-2025?utmsource=openai)). Buyers are prioritizing targets with embedded AI capabilities, modular architectures, strong renewal metrics, customer retention, and resilient growth models. From Baillie’s perspective, being clear on these drivers is essential when pitching to both strategic and financial acquirers. An open question: as AI becomes a table stakes requirement, will the premium for AI embeddedness compress as differentiation shrinks?
In sum, Baillie’s insights align with broader sector trends: companies that combine narrative with proof, modernize old workflows with new tools, position themselves either as best-of-breed or attractive acquisition targets, and maintain operational discipline stand the strongest. Areas of risk include macroeconomic headwinds, competitive pressure from large incumbents, evolving regulatory oversight, and sustainability of high multiples in a maturing AI market.